Software Engineering Evaluation Specialist

🏢 Global Corporation
📍 United Arab EmiratesFull-timeOn-site
📅 Posted: 2w ago🔄 Updated: 2w ago
CV%
✨ AI Summary
Mindrift is seeking a Software Engineering Evaluation Specialist to design and create coding tasks for AI agents. The role involves inventing realistic developer scenarios with broken software, building reproducible Docker environments, writing pytest for verification, and creating instructional materials. The specialist will calibrate task difficulty and iterate based on QA feedback. This is a project-based role with a realistic weekly load of 8-20 hours, offering compensation up to $35/hour.
Required Skills
Information Technology
PythonPyTestDockerLinuxDebuggingJira
Other
Bashstracelsofjournalctlcoding task designreference solution writingQA review
Design, Content & Media
Content Writing
Engineering, Construction & Trades
Calibration
Nice to have:
Information Technology
Cloud SecuritySystems AdministrationNginxNumPyPyTorchSciPyDevOpsGitPyTestSoftware Engineering
Soft Skills & Professional Competencies
Systems Thinking
Other
cronuvpoetrypyproject.tomlcoverage.pyllvm-covkcovHypothesisfuzzingproperty-based testing
Science & Research
Scientific Computing
🎁 Benefits & Perks
Paid contributions, rates up to $35/hour*. Task-based compensation. Some projects include incentive payments.
Requirements
Requires 3+ years of production software development in a backend stack (Python, Go, Node.js, Java, or Rust) with strong Python and pytest fluency. Must have experience with Docker authoring, Linux, Bash, and interacting with AI coding agents. B2+ written English proficiency is mandatory.
Description
Job description / Role Job Type Full Time Job Location UAE Nationality Any Nationality Salary Not Specified Gender Not Specified Arabic Fluency Not Specified Job Function IT - Software & Web Development Company Industry Software & Internet Services Please submit your CV in English and indicate your level of English proficiency. Mindrift connects specialists with project-based AI opportunities for leading tech companies, focused on testing, evaluating, and improving AI systems. Participation is project-based, not permanent employment. About the role You’ll design coding tasks that challenge frontier AI coding agents. Each task is a self-contained Docker environment with a broken piece of software; an AI agent attempts the fix; automated tests verify the outcome. Your deliverable is the full task package: broken code, tests, instructions, and a reference solution proving the task is solvable. Responsibilities: Invent a realistic developer scenario — a real bug, a broken ETL, a missing feature — not a toy problem. Build a reproducible Docker environment with pinned dependencies. Write a pytest that verifies outcomes, not specific commands — deterministic, non-flaky, and does not leak the fix. Write an instruction.md that reads like a Jira ticket a developer would receive. Write a reference solve.sh proving the task is solvable. Calibrate difficulty so current state-of-the-art agents solve the task 20–60% of the time. Iterate based on feedback from expert QA reviewers. Later: review other authors’ tasks as a QA reviewer. Not in scope Data labeling, prompt engineering. Production code to ship — you design problems and verification for AI agents. Leetcode puzzles — scenarios must look like real developer work. Not every candidate task ships — quality over quantity. Requirements 3+ years of production software development in one backend stack — Python, Go, Node.js, Java, or Rust. Depth in one stack beats breadth. Python + pytest fluency — required regardless of primary stack. The task harness is pytest-based even when the broken app is in another language. Fixtures, parametrize, monkeypatch, timeouts, conftest.py. Docker authoring — reproducible Dockerfiles, pinned dependencies, multi-stage builds when needed, non-root user. Linux & Bash — comfort debugging inside containers (strace, lsof, journalctl); shell beyond set -euo pipefail. AI coding agent experience — Claude Code, Cursor, Roo Code, or similar, on non-trivial work. You can cite a specific time the AI was confidently wrong and how you caught it. English — B2+ written. Not a fit Data science, ML, or computer vision engineers without backend-engineering output. Manual QA testers without automation or test authoring. Frontend-only, low-code/no-code, IT support, or business analysts. Engineers who have never written pytest from scratch. Junior, intern, or assistant as the most recent role. Preferred qualifications Domain depth in security, system administration (nginx / systemd / cron), scientific computing (NumPy / PyTorch / SciPy), DevOps, or Git internals. Modern Python tooling (uv, poetry, pyproject.toml). Coverage tooling (pytest-cov, coverage.py, gcov, llvm-cov, kcov). Fuzzing or property-based testing (Hypothesis). Prior contribution to agent-evaluation benchmarks or related frameworks. Process Apply? Pass qualification (90-minute sample-task screen + short behavioral interview)? Join a project? Complete tasks? Get paid. Time commitment Onboarding: ~10 hours per first task. Steady state: ~5 hours per task, 2–4 parallel tasks per author. Realistic weekly load: 8–20 hours. Higher volume available for top performers. You choose when and how to contribute; tasks must be submitted by the deadline and meet acceptance criteria. Compensation: Paid contributions, rates up to $35/hour*. Task-based compensation equivalent to hourly rate, depending on performance and volume. Some projects include incentive payments. *Rates vary based on expertise, skills assessment, location, project needs, and other factors. Higher rates may be provided to highly specialized experts. Lower rates may apply during onboarding or non-core project phases. Payment details are shared per project. Apply Now
✨ Premium Match Details
Deep-dive CV analysis, customized Cover Letters, and Interview prep!
📊 Match Analysis
Insights against your active CV
📊
Personalized Match Analysis
Upload your CV to see exact matching percentages, detailed skills mapping, and gap analysis for this role.
🎯 Overalli74%
⚡ Skillsi85%
View Breakdown
Ontology Match: 85.0
Matched:✓ Requirements Matching✓ Ontology Skills Mapping
📜 Eligibilityi49%
View Breakdown
Local: 19600%
🏗️ Career Fiti91%
View Breakdown
Seniority: 91.0
📋 Requirementsi67%
View Breakdown
Domain: 67.0
🔥 Motivationi78%
View Breakdown
Title Fit: 78.00